"Outside a dog a book is man's best friend, inside a dog it is too dark to read!" -Groucho Marx========="The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid." -Jane Austen========="I don’t believe in the kind of magic in my books. But I do believe something very magical can happen when you read a good book."-JK Rowling========"I spend a lot of time reading." -Bill Gates=========“Ahhh. Bed, book, kitten, sandwich. All one needed in life, really.” -Jacqueline Kelly=========

Tuesday, November 18, 2025

My experience with PERSUASION


I get asked this question a lot: Which is your favorite Jane Austen novel? Anyone who knows me, knows I love Jane Austen novels, movies, memorabilia, so it is a fair question. For a long time it was a decidedly emphatic answer: Pride and Prejudice. But then I read Persuasion for my second time in November 2008 I decided that perhaps this, Jane Austen's last complete novel, was my favorite or at least co-favorite. There is something about this story that touched me on a personal level. Anne Elliot, the heroine, is overlooked and underappreciated by her family, she often feels invisible. This is a position I can relate to, though for different reasons than hers. I also could see the maturity of Jane Austen's writing in this book, something made more obvious this time through since I just finished reading Northanger Abbey, Austen's first novel.

Around the same time I finished reading Persuasion for the #ReadingAusten2025 Challenge I found my copy of The Friendly Jane Austen by Natalie Tyler and decided to skip ahead to the chapter on Persuasion, to see what gems of information were available within. The chapters are divided by short essays and interviews with Austen experts about her six novels and other Austen-related topics. 

In an interview on 'Austen and Feminism' with Marlene Longenecker the author asks if she thinks Persuasion is different from her earlier novels in terms of feminism. Longenecker replies,
I do think it is more feminist because the choice of a mature and reflective heroine gave Austen the chance to explore things earlier novels did not. Anne is of course the most self-aware and self-analytical of the all of Austen's heroines, and she controls the point of view almost exclusively... Austen is one the first to give a woman what Wordsworth called the "hard task" of analyzing the soul. (201)
It is hard to think of Austen being a feminist because her characters seem so traditional but much of her writing was groundbreaking.

For all the wonderful characters Austen created, like Anne Elliot, she also created some very irritating ones. Mary Musgrove, Anne's younger sister, wins the contest for being the biggest whiner in all the novels. 
Mary Mosgrove wins as a whiner because she can't open her mouth without blaming someone. She is always convinced that everyone else has found the best seat, the best place at the table, the best sweetbread, the best of whatever is going; she therefore feels deprived at all times, writing to Anne, for instance, about how horrible it is to suffer dirty lanes at Uppercross while Anne is in Bath "with your nice pavements" (Jan Fergus interview, 206).
The worst father in all of the novels has to be Sir Walter Elliot. He is not only irresponsible with money and completely focused on class but is a narcissist of the first order. His house is full of mirrors, and he seems to only like people who reflect him, like his daughter Elizabeth. Anne does not, therefore she is not worth his regard. "Her word had no weight; her convenience was always to give way; -- she was only Anne" (208).  

I get angry every time I think about the way Anne's family treated her.

In another interview, Jane Smiley remarks on the beauty of Austen's writing style. "It is very clear; it is sparkling and ironic." When Smiley reread all the novels she noticed Austen's evolution as a writer. In her earlier works her style is mainly indirect narration. In Emma it is more like a play. "We see scenes as they happen. People appear and they say things; then there's another scene and people appear and they say things." By the time Austen writes Persuasion she is almost in a stream-of-consciousness mode because she is much more in Anne's head (214).

Perhaps this is what I noticed when I claimed Persuasion as my Austen co-favorite novel. I noticed the maturity in writing style without recognizing what I noticed. 

I probably cry more when reading this novel than any of the others. Because I know what Anne is thinking and feeling it breaks my heart for her. But all is not sad and serious, as Tony Hendra, the former editor of National Lampoon, notes, "I've always thought Jane Austen to be one of the funnier writers England has produced -- after P.G. Wodehouse and Oscar Wilde. She's beyond question the funniest woman writer who ever lit up that crepuscular isle" (213). He goes on to use an example from Persuasion. The scene is in Lyme after Louisa Musgrove sustains a bad fall and gets knocked unconscious. "The report of the accident had spread among the workmen and boatmen about the Cobb, and many were collected near them, to be useful if wanted, at any rate, to enjoy the sight of a dead young lady, nay, two dead young ladies, for it proved twice as fine as the first report."

I don't remember reading this quote on my way through the book but my impression of Austen's humor is it's often very sneaky -- there it is when you least expect it.

The last sentence of Persuasion is rather confusing and ambiguous. In the movies Anne and Captain Wentworth are hugging and kissing, a happily-ever-after-ending. This sentence implies that there is room for alarm, possibly even shortcomings in one or both of the partners: "She glorified in being a sailor's wife, but she must pay the tax of quick alarm for belonging to that profession which is, if possible, more distinguished in its domestic virtues than in its national importance." Funnily, Natalie Tyler points out, Austen poked fun in Northanger Abbey of conventional, tidy endings in novels, "and now, in her last novel, she seems to subvert the tidy ending by closing with a devilishly ambiguous sentence (217).

She still had surprises up her sleeve even in the sunset of her life.

Now I will turn my attention to Sanditon, Austen's incomplete novel. I've only read a version of it completed by "A Lady" and I want to read the original thirteen chapters penned by Austen before her death. That shouldn't be to difficult of a task, assuming I can find a copy.

All quotes from Persuasion are italicized. All other quotes come from The Friendly Jane Austen by Natalie Tyler (Penguin Books, 1999)

-Anne

Monday, November 17, 2025

TTT: Modern Classics

Top Ten Tuesday: Modern Classics
Will these books become classics? Only time will tell.



1. James by Percival Everett (2024) -- An instant classic to be read next to The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain. As with all classics, when one rereads this book I bet new aspects will be revealed.

2. Demon Copperhead by Barbara Kingsolver (2022) -- a modern twist on  Dickens' David Copperfield. Rich and multilayered, this book has a lot to tell us about modern life.

3. The Overstory by Richard Powers (2018) -- nine characters with interlocking stories about trees. This book compels the reader to think about the natural world in a new way. It is powerful stuff.

4. The Road by Cormac McCarthy (2006) -- a dystopian novel after a cataclysmic event where all remaining humans have to fight each other and the elements to stay alive. In the midst of all that horror is a father-son love story which stands in stark contrast to the horrors of daily life.

5. There's Always This Year: On Basketball and Ascension by Hanif Abdurraqib (2024, nonfiction) -- a thoughtful masterpiece. Described by one reviewer as "one of the century's most beautiful and thought-provoking exploration of adolescence and race." It is a blend of poetry, memoir, history, and cultural criticism.

6. Atonement by Ian McEwan (2001) -- A young girl makes a false accusation which impacts so many lives. The story probes the relationship between storytelling and memory. 

7. Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel (2014) -- Set during the days after civilization's collapse, this novel probes at our interconnectedness.

8. The Brief and Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Díaz (2007) -- both humorous and deep, this book begs for a reread to catch everything it has to offer.

9. My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante (2011) -- Named by the NYT as the best book of the 21st Century. It is an intense story about the friendship of two girls in post-WWII Naples.

10. The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay by Michael Chabon (2000) -- A decidedly American story. While the rest of the world was focused on the Nazi encroachment of Europe in the 1930s, we were fascinated by comics and superheroes. This book challenges the reader to think broadly.

(I've read all these books and recommend them. What do you think of my list? What books did I miss?)

-Anne

Thursday, November 13, 2025

Nonfiction Review: The Art Thief (+Friday56 LinkUp)


Title:
The Art Thief: A True Story of Love, Crime, and a Dangerous Obsession by Michael Finkel

Book Beginnings excerpt:


Friday56 excerpt:


Summary: The story of the world’s most prolific art thief, Stéphane Breitwieser.

Review: Don and I listened to The Art Thief this past week. It is a well-researched tale of a psychologically complicated, misguided, narcissistic art lover who steals artifacts from museums, galleries, and castles throughout France, Germany, Belgium, and Switzerland over several years. He steals the art not for financial gain but because he loves the art and wants to have it to look at and to touch. Over the years he and his girlfriend stole over 200 pieces, worth millions, possibly billions. Spoiler alert: to write a book about an art thief, they have to get caught!

The first half of the book focuses on what Stéphane Breitwieser stole, from where, and how he did it. It became really apparent to us that Michael Finkel did some deep sleuthing in order to uncover this level of detail. Indeed, the author says it took him eleven years to research the details in the book, which included not only many interviews with the thief himself but also with his lawyers, the prosecutors, psychologists, and art crime investigators. The book crammed a lot in a short book, weighing in at just over 200 pages.

The audiobook was narrated by Edoardo Ballerini, an American actor, who did really well pronouncing all the French, German, Swiss names and places as the story recounts Stéphane and Anne-Catherine's trips around Europe on their many stealing sprees. We both enjoyed our listening experience with The Art Thief very much.


Ratings: Don -- 4 stars; Anne -- 4.5 stars.





Sign up for The Friday56 on the Inlinkz below. 

RULES:

*Grab a book, any book
*Turn to page 56 or 56% in your e-reader (If you want to improvise, go ahead!)
*Find a snippet, but no spoilers!
*Post it to your blog and add your url to the Linky below. If you do not add the specific url for your post, we may miss it! 
*Visit other blogs and leave comments about their snippets. Expand the community. Please leave a comment for me, too!  


Also visit Book Beginnings on Friday hosted by Rose City Reader and First Line Friday hosted by Reading is My Super Power to share the beginning quote from your book.



You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter
-Anne

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Two Novellas -- Two puzzles



It's November which means it is novella month. Like all books, all novellas are not created equal. These two left me feeling flummoxed. I'm not saying I didn't like them. I just didn't understand them. They both contain a puzzle, leaving me puzzled. Have you read either/both of them? What did you think?

Invisible Cities
by Italo Calvino, translated by William Weaver, narrated by John Lee
     Audiobook version: Tantor Audio, 2013. 2 hours, 52 minutes.
     The book was originally published in Italian in 1972. The first English version was printed by Harcourt in 1974. 165 pages.

A few months ago I came across a list of the 29 Timeless Novels Everyone Should Read created by a news source (no longer available.) Among the titles on the list was one book I'd never heard of before: Invisible Cities by Italo Calvino. I read Calvino's On a Winter's Night a Traveler, and found its surrealism perplexing but also fun. I assumed that this book, Invisible Cities, would also fall into the post modern style like the other. This is how the book was described in that list: "Invisible Cities is a mesmerizing journey through the imagined cities Marco Polo describes to Kublai Khan. Each city, unique in its essence, unfolds like a delicate poem, revealing glimpses of human nature and the intricacies of civilizations."

As I listened to the audiobook I was aware that there was structure to the book. There were 55 different cities described by Marco Polo to Kublai Khan as each chapter had a title that seemed to have a repeating pattern. But audiobooks don't allow the eyes to play with patterns needed for understanding. When I looked on Wikipedia I finally realized why I was so confused by the plot. It wasn't a plot. It was a form. Follow the link I've provided and scroll down a bit and you will see that matrix to see what Calvino was doing with his 55 stories about invisible cities. 
Invisible Cities is an example of Calvino's use of combinatory literature [this type of writing which challenges conventional structures]...In the novel, the reader finds themself playing a game with the author, wherein they must find the patterns hidden in the book. The book has nine chapters, but there are also hidden divisions within the book: each of the 55 cities belongs to one of eleven thematic groups. The reader can therefore play with the book's structure, and choose to follow one group or another, rather than reading the book in chronological chapters. In 1983 Calvino stated that there is no definite end to Invisible Cities because "this book was made as a polyhedron, and it has conclusions everywhere, written along all of its edges." Wikipedia 
Think of those kid books where the reader gets to choose-your-own-story, making decisions along the way which alter the outcome. This book is just quite a bit more complex than those. The puzzle and the form are just as important as the stories in this one. It is very mathematical and a genius work. However, its genius was lost on me, an audiobook listener. I did appreciate the beauty of the prose and at some point I told myself to quit trying to figure out what was going on and just let the words flow over me. Clearly I do not recommend this book in the audio format. If you like challenges and puzzles, choose the print version.

Rating: 3.25 stars


Audition by Katie Kitamura
Riverhead Books, 2025. 197 pages.

"One woman, the performance of a lifetime. Or two. A mesmerizing Mobius strip of a novel that asks who we are to the people we love" (Publisher).

Two people meet for a lunch. She is an accomplished actress. He is young man, young enough to be her son. Who are they to each other? Audition is a story in two parts and those two parts don't seem to be connected. They are just confusingly next to each other but they both can't be true can they?

My head swam as I read Audition, trying to make sense of the puzzle I was presented. Confusion reigned and then the book ended. I was desperate to talk in person to anyone else who had read the book but had to rely on Goodreads reviews. Examples:
Emily, 2 stars: A frustrating, high-concept piece of writing. It was beautifully-written and I appreciate it was clever, but it was not my cup of tea.
Emma, 5 stars: Everybody needs to read this book immediately. I don't want to talk about anything else.
Not helpful. Emily and Emma both said pretty much what I said. 

Today I found this interview with the author which was helpful. Kitamura talks about her inspiration for the novel and how she intentionally tried to create a puzzle that cannot be solved. She also compared the story to the ambiguous duck-rabbit image. If you look at the from one angle it is duck, another angle it is a rabbit. Not really helpful in understanding the story, but it is a cool visual. Listen to the video. It is only 9 minutes long and there are no spoilers. I wish I'd listened to it before I read the book. I think it would have saved my brain from being blown.


My rating: 3.5 stars

-Anne

Monday, November 10, 2025

TTT: Books I Enjoyed Even Though They Were Outside My Comfort Zone



Top Ten Tuesday: 
Books I Enjoyed Even Though They Were Outside My Comfort Zone

I have been reading so many genres lately (58 different genres according to StoryGraph) I honestly can say I don't avoid any genre now, but here are some books which did present a challenge to me:

The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky -- 

Books by the old Russians scare me because they are so dense and so long. I made my way through this one finally and really enjoyed the experience and felt good about myself for finishing it. (DENSE AND LONG)


The Buffalo Hunter Hunter by Stephen Graham Jones -- 

This is a vampire story. I usually try to avoid the horror genre but I read this one and really liked it. It has tons of history about Indigenous people in it. That is what I liked best about the story. (HORROR)


The Safekeep by Yael van der Wouden --

I try to avoid books with explicit sex scenes. I was too far into the story to stop reading even though the sex scenes in it were more detailed than anything I'd ever read before. Outside of that, the story had a lot to recommend it. Another historical fiction based on some actual events. (EXPLICIT SEX)

 
Hamlet by William Shakespeare --

Don't get me wrong. I am a Shakespeare fan and love seeing his plays acted out. I just do not like reading plays in general. Something about the whole script thing with notations of who is saying what and all the stage directions off to the side I find incredibly difficult to read and enjoy. I've discovered recently, however, if I listen to the audiobook of plays then I can enjoy them. That's how I consumed Hamlet, finally! (PLAYS)

Pedro Paramo by Juan Rulfo --

I don't avoid avoid magical realism but I have to psyche myself up to read it because half the time I don't understand it. This book is one of the most influential books of that genre and I am so glad I read it, even if I missed a few things. (MAGICAL REALISM)



We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson --

I avoided reading anything by this author for years because I had heard how scary her books were. This is probably categorized as "horror" but I think it is really a psychological thriller/mystery. I found it really compelling. (HORROR/SCARY)


A Bride's Story by Kaoru Mori --

I enjoy reading graphic novels and do so quite often. But I do not enjoy reading manga. I get all confused by the way the diagram swirls the opposite way so the stories never makes sense to me. The Bride's Story was one manga book/series I could read and I enjoyed the diagrams very much. (MANGA)


Orbital by Samantha Harvey --

I don't choose to read Science Fiction very often, especially if the books are set in far off planets with complicated world-building and even more complicated place names or character names. Orbital is my type of Sci-Fi -- based on a real place (the International Space Station) and relatable characters. (SOME SCI-FI)


Adrift: America in 100 Charts by Scott Galloway --

This book isn't outside my comfort zone I just don't usually think to pick up map or chart books. This one completely fascinated me and makes me want to read more books like it with LOTS of illustrations. (CHARTS AND MAPS)


The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas --

Another classic book I avoided for years just because it is so dang long. The version associated with the photo of the book is 1276 pages long. When I finally challenged myself to read it I was tremendously proud of myself until other people told me they reread it every year. I won't go that far. (LONG CLASSICS)



-Anne

Sunday, November 9, 2025

Sunday Salon and Nonfiction November -- Week 3

Weather: Lovely. Sunny and crisp today. This week we endured king tides and atmospheric rivers, however, bother weather terms we never even heard of as kids.

Nonfiction November, Week Three prompt: This week, pair up a nonfiction book with a fiction title. Maybe it’s a historical novel and the real history in a nonfiction version, or a memoir and a novel, or a fiction book you’ve read and you would like recommendations for background reading. Or maybe it’s just two books you feel have a link, whatever they might be. You can be as creative as you like!



Nonfiction books about Jane Austen, the author of Pride and Prejudice and six other novels. I consider myself a Janeite, or a devoted follower of this author, and enjoy reading books about her and the time period in which she lived -- the Regency period in Great Britain. Currently I am reading two of the books pictured above, finished reading one just the other day, and hope to reread the other two soon.


This year I am participating with the Classics Club/BronasBooks Challenge #ReadingAusten2025 to read all/some of the Jane Austen books and to participate in discussions about this beloved author. So far I have reread three of her six major works:
  • Sense and Sensibility
  • Northanger Abbey
  • Persuasion -- review pending
    • Hyperlinks to my recent reviews
  • I haven't reread these three major works: Pride and Prejudice; Emma; and Mansfield Park.
    • Hyperlinks to my older/past reviews
  • Love and Friendship is considered part of her juvenalia writings, along with The Watsons, Lady Susan, The History of England.
  • Sanditon, was incomplete at the time of Austen's death in 1817.

Other books I've recently completed or am currently reading/listening to:
  • Audition by Katie Kitamura. A Booker Prize finalist. Read for Novellas in November Challenge. Audiobook. Complete. Rating: 4 Stars.
  • Henry and June by Anais Nin. With completion of this unexpurgated diary (nonfiction) I have completed the genre challenge on StoryGraph. E-book. Rating: 2 stars.
  • Invisible Cities by Italo Calvino. A novella and a classic. I liked the words but not sure I understood the point. Audiobook. 3 stars.
  • Theory and Practice by Michelle de Kretser. A novella and the 2025 Stella Prize winner. Audiobook. Upgraded rating: 4 stars.
  • My Friends by Fredrik Backman. A book club selection. Audiobook. 4 stars.
  • Heart the Lover by Lily King. An audiobook. I am enjoying this very much. 28% complete.
  • The Art Thief by Michael Finkel. Audiobook with Don and nonfiction. 43% complete.
  • White Nights by Fyodor Dostoevsky. My Classics Club Spin selection. Print. 41% complete.
Additional blogging links:

-Anne

Friday, November 7, 2025

Novella Review: THEORY AND PRACTICE


Theory and Practice by Michelle de Kretser won the 2025 Stella Prize, the Prime Minister's Literary Award for Australia, and a finalist on the Victorian Premier's Prize for fiction. Not being Australian I had to look up all these awards to see if I could figure out an American or UK equivalent for these prizes. The Stella Prize goes to Australian women (or non-binary writers) for an original, engaging book in fiction, poetry, and nonfiction. The equivalent would be The Women's Prize (UK) or the Carol Shields Prize (Canada or US). I'm not sure there is an equivalent for the Victorian Premier's Literary Awards. It goes to excellent writers from or permanently living in Australia. Victoria is one of six states in Australia but the award doesn't seem to go to only residents of that state. And the Prime Minister's Literary Award sounds like it is similar to the Pulitzer Prize or the National Book Award in the US. That said, Theory and Practice cleaned up in the prize category this year in Australia. And for good reason. It is a brilliantly literary book.

So literary, in fact, I'm afraid my daughter would hate it. She told me once she didn't usually like the books I pick to read because they are so literary (said with disdain.) I asked her what she meant and she said these books seem like to try too hard to write cleverly, using fancy techniques. Hmm. Not sure about the fancy techniques in this book unless one uses the title as a big gigantic hint as to the main theme of the book: theory and practice.

The narrator of the book is a first-generation immigrant from Sri Lanka. She is living in Melbourne and is attending Grad School in English Lit. Her thesis relates to Virginia Woolf, specifically analyzing three of the author's works on feminism and the "generated self." The narrator (Does she have a name? I can't remember!) says that Woolf single-handedly saved her during her teen years. But theory is one thing especially when it comes up against real-life experiences. Calling yourself a feminist is one thing but attending a school where the professors in the department are predominantly male is a whole other thing. As the narrator reads more about Woolf she realizes if she, a Sri Lankan female with golden-brown skin and from a humble background, was to meet the author today, Woolf would dismiss her on either a racial or a classist basis, or both. Theory is one thing. But the practice of that theory is whole other thing.

I didn't especially like this novella. The narrator spent a lot of time focused on her relationship/not relationship with a man named Kit and she got all "stalker-ish" in her behavior...very unfeminist behavior, by the way. But since I finished the book a week ago I keep thinking about how brilliant the writer was sticking to her theme of theory vs practice. In fact, I keep coming up with examples from my own life. Simple stuff like believing that plastics are wrecking our environment yet I keep buying things in plastic containers. It is fine to believe a thing but so hard to practice that theory in reality.

I rated the book 3.5 stars but let's just say, with a round up, it is a 4 stars title.

Theory and Practice is 192 pages long.
 

-Anne

Thursday, November 6, 2025

Review: MY FRIENDS (+Friday56 LinkUp)


Title:
My Friends by Fredrik Backman, translated from Swedish by Neil Smith

Book Beginnings excerpt:
Louisa is a teenager, the best kind of human.

Friday56 excerpt, from page 22, the last page of preview:
Then he asked one of the other fourteen-year-olds: "Do you think we'll all still be friends when we're grown up?"

Summary:
Most people don’t even notice them—three tiny figures sitting at the end of a long pier in the corner of one of the most famous paintings in the world. Most people think it’s just a depiction of the sea. But Louisa, an aspiring artist herself, knows otherwise, and she is determined to find out the story of these three enigmatic figures.

Twenty-five years earlier, in a distant seaside town, a group of teenagers find refuge from their bruising home lives by spending long summer days on an abandoned pier, telling silly jokes, sharing secrets, and committing small acts of rebellion. These lost souls find in each other a reason to get up each morning, a reason to dream, a reason to love.

Out of that summer emerges a transcendent work of art, a painting that will unexpectedly be placed into eighteen-year-old Louisa’s care. She embarks on a surprise-filled cross-country journey to learn how the painting came to be and to decide what to do with it. The closer she gets to the painting’s birthplace, the more nervous she becomes about what she’ll find. Louisa is proof that happy endings don’t always take the form we expect in this stunning testament to the transformative, timeless power of friendship and art. (Publisher)
Review: I have an uneasy relationship with Fredrik Backman books. I've read four of them: A Man Named Ove; Anxious People; Beartown; and now My Friends. All of them were slow-starters for me. I had to make myself read them (all four were book club selections) and I would put it off as long as possible. This is unusual reading behavior for me. With My Friends, I got the audiobook from the library after a fairly long wait and I still couldn't make myself listen, so I checked out the print version and made a little progress but I wasn't even a fourth of the way finished before that book needed to be returned. Once again I had to wait for the audiobook. This time, with the clock ticking, I finally finished the book and you know what? I liked it. Surprise, surprise. What was my problem in the first place?

The story is told of the four teenage friends the summer they helped launch the artist's talents, when he painted the beautiful piece of his friends on the pier, a painting now worth millions. Then a jump forward in time of 25 years when the artist and Louisa meet up by chance -- a disillusioned teenager and a dying man. This meeting changes the trajectory of her life. What follows is a road trip (via train) and the unspooling of a story of friendship and love.

Because I was so grumpy about the bad start I had with the book I was determined not to like the finished product -- my fault not the author's. But I confess that days after I finished reading My Friends I was still living inside the lives of the four +one teenager's lives. I wanted the story to go on. I missed the book when I was finished. (I'm rolling my eyes at myself right now.) And I know that is a sign of a good book.

My advice to you if you'd like to give this one a chance, don't TRY to read this book and muck around for two months, just START and KEEP GOING. The story will grow on you if you aren't all in at the beginning.

My rating; 4 stars




Sign up for The Friday56 on the Inlinkz below. 

RULES:

*Grab a book, any book
*Turn to page 56 or 56% in your e-reader (If you want to improvise, go ahead!)
*Find a snippet, but no spoilers!
*Post it to your blog and add your url to the Linky below. If you do not add the specific url for your post, we may miss it! 
*Visit other blogs and leave comments about their snippets. Expand the community. Please leave a comment for me, too!  


Also visit Book Beginnings on Friday hosted by Rose City Reader and First Line Friday hosted by Reading is My Super Power to share the beginning quote from your book.

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter
-Anne

Nonfiction Review: FURIOUS HOURS: MURDER, FRAUD, AND THE LAST TRIAL OF HARPER LEE (+Discussion questions)


In a 2024 survey, 12.6% of respondents named To Kill a Mockingbird as their all-time favorite book from a given list. In 2021 a British survey found that 13% of the respondents named TKAM as the most inspirational novel. In the 2018 PBS "The Great American Read" it was named as America's best-loved novel overall. All of these surveys took place over 50 years after 1960 when Harper Lee penned her famous book and still today people everywhere sing its praises. If I were asked what is my all-time-favorite novel I'd answer To Kill a Mockingbird, too. So why, with all this success, did its author not publish another book for the next 50 years? 

Furious Hours: Murder, Fraud, and the Last Trial of Harper by Casey Cep attempts to answer that question but it also shows how Harper Lee did attempt to write another book, a true-crime book, but abandoned her attempt many years into the project.

Back in the 1960s and 70s there was a black preacher in Alabama named Willie Maxwell. He was well liked and often called Reverend Maxwell, even when he didn't have a church. Then in in August 1970s his wife's bloated, dead body was found in a car in a remote area off the highway. She has clearly been beaten to death and all signs pointed to the Reverend as the suspect in her murder. A neighbor reported that around 10 pm Mary Lou had told her that Willie had called and needed a ride home, that his car was broken down. She was the last person to see Mary Lou alive. It was well know that the Reverend had many lady friends but what wasn't known was how many insurance policies were written in Mary Lou's name with Willie being the beneficiary. In those days it was surprisingly easy to take out life insurance policies on anyone and name yourself the beneficiary. It took the state a surprisingly long time to bring charges against Willie and by then the neighbor had changed her story about what Mary Lou said to her the night of her death. What the jury didn't hear was by that time Willie and this neighbor had become friendly and were planning to get married.

A year after their marriage this second wife was also found dead in a car alongside a country road. She had seventeen life insurance policies in her name. "For the Reverend," writes Cep, "becoming a widower was quite a lucrative business." After her death the Reverend took out life insurance policies on his mother, his brothers, his nephew, his aunt, even his just legitimized infant daughter and the bodies started piling up. Everyone knew it was the Reverend but getting the charges to stick was another story. Eventually justice was found for the Reverend but not through the courts. 

Enter Harper Lee and the second half of the book. It's been fourteen years since TKAM was published. Everyone is bugging Lee to write another book. Why not write a true crime story and go about the research the way she did when she was helping Truman Capote do his research for In Cold Blood? Eventually Lee spent a year in town interviewing and going over all the evidence she could get her hands one for the Maxwell cases. She worked with the lawyer who had been Maxwell's attorney. She uncovered every stone there was to uncover, then she returned to New York to write her book she was calling The Reverend. 

Unfortunately, after years of trying she gave up the project admitting she just didn't know how to organize all the information. During the intervening years between TKAM and this project the editor, Tay Hohoff, who worked with Lee at J.B. Lippincott, had either died or was retired. Lee floundered without the guidance of such a strong and capable editor behind her. Oddly, Casey Cep, this books author, was able to put together the whole Maxwell Murders debacle into a very interesting and compelling account in the book's first part and went on to write an excellent biography of Harper Lee in the 2nd. 

Time Magazine's Lucas Wittmann said this about Cep, "In elegant prose, she gives us the fullest story yet of Lee’s post-Mockingbird life ... an account emotionally attuned to the toll that great writing takes, and shows that sometimes one perfect book is all we can ask for, even while we wish for another."

In some ways I'm sorry I read Furious Hours because Harper Lee, the author of my favorite book, didn't come out smelling like roses here. She drank an awful lot and was, perhaps, an alcoholic. Whether she was or wasn't, alcohol use got in the way of her ability to write from Cep's reporting. After the collapse of the Reverend project, she never again attempted to publish anything other than a few letters or essays. In fact, just this year, a collection of stories and essays by Lee was published in The Land of Sweet Forever. And right after Lee's death in 2016 her sister published Go Set a Watchman, the book she wrote before To Kill a Mockingbird. It was a book she never wanted to publish (and many people wished hadn't been published since it casts the hero, Atticus Finch, in a very bad light.)

I read Furious Hours book for an upcoming book club. I gave the book the rating of 4 stars.

Discussion questions for Furious Hours:


1. How did the book change the way you think about Harper Lee and her literary legacy? What were you most surprised to learn?

2. What were the most disturbing aspects of Reverend Maxwell’s murder spree and the connection between him and his victims? 

3. What surprised you the most about the life insurance policies and the way these companies did business?

4. Discuss how race played into the case of the Reverend Willie Maxwell.

5. What were your first impressions of Tom Radney? How did your perception of him change as you read the book?

6. What do you think about the morality of Robert Burns’s decision to murder the Reverend Willie Maxwell? Do you think his acquittal was right? 

7. How did Harper Lee and Truman Capote’s relationship play into the larger story? How do you think Lee’s experience with In Cold Blood shaped her approach to writing her own true crime tale?

8. Why do you think the Maxwell case captivated Lee’s attention enough to dedicate years of her life to writing it? Do you think she finished it? If not, what do you think stopped her? What do you think happened to whatever existed of the manuscript?

9. Furious Hours combines the horror and mystery of a true crime tale with the in-depth history and detail of a biography. How does Cep integrate the two different pieces of the book? Why do you think Cep was able to pull off what Lee couldn't?

10. How does Furious Hours distinguish itself from other nonfiction books you have read? What other narrative nonfiction books have you enjoyed reading and would recommend to others?

(These excellent discussion questions come from the Sarasota Springs Public Library. I tweaked them just a bit but credit to the librarians at that library.)
-Anne

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Reviews: TIMECODE OF A FACE and A STUDY IN SCARLET

November means novellas and nonfiction, and, if I'm lucky, two in one: short nonfiction (which is allowed for the Novellas in November Challenge!) The problem with reading short books is they often can be easily consumed in one or two days which means the reviews really start piling up. Right now I am eight reviews behind! Eek! In an attempt to catch up I shall attempt to write and publish two reviews a day. If that isn't sustainable I will at least aim for one. Don't expect lengthy reviews. Like the books themselves likely the reviews will be short.

Timecode of a Face by Ruth Ozeki
Audio: Canongate Books, 2022, 1 hour, 51 minutes.
Originally published by Restless Books, 2015.


Ruth Ozeki, a favorite author and a Zen Buddhist priest, sets herself the task of staring at her own face in the mirror for three hours hoping to discover new aspects of herself and her heritage. According to ancient Zen traditions "your face before your parents were born is your original face." Staring into the mirror for a long time Ruth Ozeki hoped to discover her true self and her true identity beyond what she knew from her parents. As she gazes on her reflection her thoughts ripple out to memories growing up as a mixed race child -- her mother was Japanese, her father Caucasian -- and the ugly racism she endured. Her thoughts also lingered on the process of becoming a Buddhist priest and having to shave her head as she took her final vows. She also reflected on her studies of the intricate art of the Japanese Noh mask, at one point even making one herself.

Throughout this essay Ruth Ozeki shows herself to be a well-grounded, interesting and interested person, a writer of great integrity. I am a big fan of her books, A Tale for the Time Being and The Book of Form and Emptiness, and now her essay writing. I am fascinated by her life story and how she incorporates Buddhist practices and beliefs into her writing. I didn't learn a ton from this essay but what I did learn about Zen Buddhism was so interesting. In fact, I found those bits of information much more captivating than what she thought of her earlobes.

I listened to the audiobook read by the author herself. It seemed perfectly paced and I was satisfied with what I got out of the listening experience. But here is one thing I've never encountered before when writing a review -- when I visited the author's own webpage, Ozekiland, she refers to this book by a different title: The Face: A Time Code. I'm not sure when and why it was changed, but if you have trouble finding it at a bookstore or library, you might want to try both title variations in your search.

My rating: 4.25 stars.

____________________________________________________

A Study in Scarlet by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Audio: Prince Frederick: Recorded Books, 2017, 4 hours and 30 minutes.
Originally published: Ward, Locke, and Company, 1887.

A Study in Scarlet is Conan Doyle's first introduction of Sherlock Holmes, a fictional detective who has been dominating our imaginations for over 100 years. As in subsequent short stories about the detective the narration is handled by Dr. Watson who has recently returned to London after being wounded in the Battle of Maiwand. After agreeing to share an apartment with Holmes, Watson learns that his flatmate is a detective consultant, helping the police solve cases they have not been able to handle on their own. In this case, a corpse, an American from Ohio, is found in an uninhabited apartment dead on his back. There is blood but seemingly not from the corpse. After the police bungle the case, Holmes swoops in and figures out who dunnit with, what we have come to expect, just minute details everyone else overlooked. As it turns out the murderer had a vendetta against the dead man and his story jumps back to Utah territory and the Mormon settlement there. I won't share any more details because, it is a mystery and I don't want to reveal any spoilers for you.

I expected the first half of the story -- Dr. Watson as narrator; Holmes as eccentric go-it-alone detective; incompetent police -- but I did not expect, in fact I was bowled over by, the anti-Mormon message of the second half. What? Where did that come from? It always strikes me as funny/odd when a classic book, which has been published for years and years, surprises me with a plot twist I didn't see coming and no one has bothered to mention it to me my whole life. Ha!

This is only my second Sherlock Holmes story I've read. The other, The Hound of the Baskervilles, is much better, but if one wants to start at the beginning, this is place to start.

3.5 stars.



-Anne