"Outside a dog a book is man's best friend, inside a dog it is too dark to read!" -Groucho Marx========="The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid." -Jane Austen========="I don’t believe in the kind of magic in my books. But I do believe something very magical can happen when you read a good book."-JK Rowling========"I spend a lot of time reading." -Bill Gates=========“Ahhh. Bed, book, kitten, sandwich. All one needed in life, really.” -Jacqueline Kelly=========
Showing posts with label Pulitzer Prize winners. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pulitzer Prize winners. Show all posts

Friday, July 17, 2026

Review: ANGEL DOWN (2026 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction winner)


You know that opening bell followed by the words "And they're off!" to start a horse race? Well, that would be a perfect way to begin reading Angel Down by Daniel Kraus, the 2026 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction winner. Ron Winters, writing for the NYT, described the work as "a thunderous gallop of a novel, starting off midsentence and mid-battle." That galloping pace doesn't let up for the whole race book. It goes on and on, one sentence in "285 dizzying, blood-soaked, astonishing pages." Yes, you read that right. One sentence. As the family grammarian, my husband observes that even though Kraus doesn't use periods, you can't really call this one sentence. 

Daniel Kraus typically writes horror novels. He swerved into historical fiction in Angel Down to write a WWI novel, albeit one filled with horror -- the man-made horror of war. In the first half sentence of the novel, Pvt. Cyril Bagger wakes up from a near-death experience in a field littered with the bodies and body parts of his fellow soldiers. The most terrifying scream ever heard by anyone arises in the midst of all the carnage. Before his commanding officer leaves the area with the rest of his unit, Bagger and four other soldiers are ordered to find and euthanize the fallen comrade in obvious misery. The team is forced to go into No Man's Land to find the screamer. What they find is not a wounded soldier but a fallen angel, one of God's best, tangled in barb wire, emitting the mournful wail. For the rest of the novel Pvt. Bagger tries to defend the angel, guarding her from the threats of battle zones and other soldiers, now turned predators. His goal is to deliver her to safety. But where is that exactly?
Cutting through the rot and horror, like a system of trenches. is a savage satire of war, reminiscent of Catch-22 and Dr. Strangelove. Kraus’s most indelible creation in this vein is the sneering Major General Reis, so desperate for a Medal of Honor that he’d single-handedly prolong the war until he gets one (Winters).
The angel is prepared to perform miracles, she is all-powerful after all, and to provide the soldiers what they desire. But are their desires what they really need? Each soldier in the rescue squad succumbs to one of the deadly sins trying to exploit the angel and her powers, except Bagger who above all wants to deliver her to safety -- the only selfless act. The angel seems to hold the key to ending the war, but none of the mortals can get their act together to make that happen. Kraus resisted the temptation to rely on the usual angel tropes of easy redemption and he also avoided reciting any syrupy moral lessons. Instead, readers are left to figure out for themselves what the angel might represent and what one should think about the morality of war.

Don and I listened to the audiobook of Angel Down on a recent road trip, so we weren't always aware of the whole "book-in-one-sentence" thing. Don commented at some point how every transition started with the word "and" which makes sense but it was irritating in the predictable repetition. However, we weren't aware at the time that the opening begins mid-sentence and the book ends with a comma -- which implies there is no end to war and turmoil. We were very conscious of the galloping pace. Don wondered if the narrator was reading at breakneck speed on purpose and we decided it was intentional. Narrators will usually drop their voices at the end of every sentence when reading aloud. Since there was not a period in sight, the narrator could never drop his voice. The technique was both disconcerting and thrilling at the same time, creating the sense of frenzy and urgency of a war zone.

And then there was the stunning conclusion. Stunning. I'm still rendered speechless weeks after finishing the book.

Don and I were both prepared to not like the book, this being a(n anti-) war novel with a steady dose of blood and guts, but we both ended up liking it a lot. We had good discussions about the imagery and moral dilemmas presented and we thought the author made brilliant points about the inanity of war. 5 stars from both.




-Anne

Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Classic review: THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS


The Magnificent Ambersons
by Booth Tarkington won the Pulitzer Prize for the best novel in 1919. At the time Tarkington was considered one of America's best novelists and was often compared to Mark Twain. Tarkington was from Indiana and The Magnificent Ambersons story could have been taken from his own family's fall from fame. Though he was very popular when he was alive, publishing over 45 books and  25 plays, he did not remain popular after his death. By the middle of the twentieth century "he was ignored in academia: no congresses, no societies, no journals of 'Tarkington Studies'." In 1985 he was used as the example of the disparity of a writer's fame while alive compared to their oblivion after death.  Fortunately for Mark Twain, no one is comparing the two authors today.

In a nutshell, The Magnificent Ambersons was a story of three generations of Ambersons and their declining fortunes. Major Amberson makes a fortune after the Civil War and sets himself up in what is probably Indianapolis (it is never named in the book) where he builds a big mansion on a huge estate and sets about naming parks and statues after himself. The time period of the novel, between the war and the beginning of the 20th Century is a time of great industrialization and the Ambersons just aren't nimble enough to invest in the future and change with the times. They are still stuck in the past when a person's name, Amberson, was more important than what work one did. As one of George Amberson's friend says, "Don't you think being things is 'rahthuh bettuh' than doing things?"

George Amberson Minafer, the Major's grandson, is a complete brat and ill-equipped for the industrial life of the 20th Century and he is the last of the Ambersons to survive and he becomes a witness to the demise of the family fortune, forcing him to work to pay his bills. Honestly he was such a brat I found myself almost cheering when he was forced to move from the family mansion to a small apartment where his only activity outside of work was walking since he still scorned the new-fangled automobiles popping up everywhere. The best part of the book was the first chapter which was a riff on what life was like for those with money:
Magnificence, like the size of a fortune, is always comparative, as even Magnificent Lorenzo may now perceive, if he has happened to haunt New York in 1916; and the Ambersons were magnificent in their day and place. Their splendour lasted throughout all the years that saw their Midland town spread and darken into a city, but reached its topmost during the period when every prosperous family with children kept a Newfoundland dog. In that town, in those days, all the women who wore silk or velvet knew all the other women who wore silk or velvet, and when there was a new purchase of sealskin, sick people were got to windows to see it go by. Trotters were out, in the winter afternoons, racing light sleighs on National Avenue and Tennessee Street; everybody recognized both the trotters and the drivers; and again knew them as well on summer evenings, when slim buggies whizzed by in renewals of the snow-time rivalry. For that matter, everybody knew everybody else's family horse-and-carriage, could identify such a silhouette half a mile down the street, and thereby was sure who was going to market, or to a reception, or coming home from office or store to noon dinner or evening supper. 
Outside of the first chapter I admit I didn't care for the book which I rated with 3 stars. Just because a book won the Pulitzer Prize, I am finding, it doesn't mean the book will age well. And The Magnificent Ambersons has not aged well. (I can't even imagine anyone in 1919 liking it.) It is interesting to think about what life was like during this time period, however, and I found myself thinking of my grandparents. My grandfather was born in 1889 and my grandmother in 1892. They were both alive during the time period of this book. Of course neither of them lived around opulent wealth but they both witnessed the advent of cars, planes, radios, air-conditioning, phones (I think), television, electricity, indoor plumbing. (See list here.) Imagine a life without these things. I never gave my grandparents credit for living through such huge changes without becoming sticks-in-the-mud like George Amberson Minafer. Even my parents, who were both born in the late 1920s lived through many, many changes. My mom remembers the ice man delivering ice for their ice box, and my dad talked about pranks they played concerning outhouses. It is a minor miracle that my mom, age 96, can manage email just fine, even if texting is outside her skill set.
 
Even though I didn't love The Magnificent Ambersons I am glad I read it. It gave me so much to think about related to changes during the industrial revolution and life during the early period of my grandparents' lives.

-Anne

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

A Little Bit of Pulitzer Drama: JAMES



I breathed a sigh of relief on Monday afternoon when I learned the Pulitzer Prize for fiction went to the best book of 2024: James by Percival Everett. The Pulitzer Board got it right this year, selecting a book which has the true feel of a modern classic, riffing on another classic, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. I even spent a few moments after learning of the winner, imagining English classes in high school or college reading the two books side by side making comparisons to the plot, the language, the times. To say it mildly, I was delighted.

I did note there were three finalists announced. not the usual two, alongside the winner. None of these books -- Headshot (Bullwinkel); Unicorn Woman (Jones); and Mice 1961 (Levine) -- are well known to me. In fact, I don't think they are well known to many readers as evidenced by the low number of reviews on Goodreads: 
  • Headshot: 3.5 stars; 10,108 ratings; 1,890 reviews
  • Unicorn Woman: 3.09 stars; 140 ratings. 27 reviews.
  • Mice 1961: 3.52 stars; 61 ratings; 19 reviews.
Lest you think these are good numbers, especially for Headshot, here are the comparative numbers for the winner:
  • James: 4.49 stars; 294,414 ratings; 32,758 reviews.
I'm not saying the other three books aren't good, worthy of our notice, but they are not in the same ballpark with James. Whew, I thought, they got it right this year.

Then I learned about the controversy.

According to an article in the New York Times, "James Won the Pulitzer, But Not Without Complications" (May 6, 2025). James wasn't the first choice of the Pulitzer jury. Here are the highlights from the article:
-First, a reminder of the process -- a jury of five authors and literary critics wade through a vast number of books each year and select three titles to forward to the Pulitzer Board. The board then takes a vote which of the three to select as the winner. If the board cannot reach a majority decision on one book they may decide to not give out an award, as they did in 2012, or they can reach back to the jury and ask for another recommendation. James was the 4th book on their list.

-As delighted as many in the literary world were with James, it was mentioned that the three finalists were all authored by women. And James, the only book of the four authored by a man, was selected. Many wanted to pick at that scab, but Stacey Levine, author of Mice 1961, was demissive to this criticism, noting in an email that, at a moment when diversity initiatives and public funding for the arts are at risk, the Pulitzer Prize stands for integrity — a quality worth celebrating.“Percival’s book is so important in this regard,” Levine wrote in an email. “Is this really the time to fuss about what might or might not be gender politics in a literary contest?”
One has to wonder, however, if Percival Everett is smarting a bit since this news surfaced. Here he is the winner of one of the biggest literary prizes in the world and then he learns his book was actually selected as fourth place by the selection jury. 

But here's the thing -- If the award had gone to another little-known book, one could quibble about the male-female thing. But James' merit stands out. Not only did James win the National Book Award in 2024, it also won the Kirkus Prize and was a finalist for the Booker Prize and the PEN/Faulkner Award. Percival Everett, a Black author, has a large body of work which has spanned his long career. He has published 30+ books. His book, Telephone, was a finalist for the Pulitzer in 2021 and was published by a small, independent press. Though James is published by Doubleday in the US, one cannot lay the criticism on this author for being a part of some publishing cabal, ruled by the big publishers.

Last year I was fairly critical of the Pulitzer Board for selecting Night Watch by Jayne Anne Phillips, a female author and a lesser known book, overlooking a fantastic book by another Black male author, The Heaven and Earth Grocery Store by James McBride. So now the tables are turned. Apparently the Pulitzer Board lives in that liminal space between two schools of thought.

My hope for each new award book -- to live well beyond its publishing year, becoming a classic book worthy of being read 50, 100 years from now. I believe James is such a book.

-Anne

P.S.Here is my review of James, written in October 2024. I'd be honored if you'd read it. Let me know your thoughts.


Friday, May 2, 2025

Predicting the Pulitzer Prize Fiction for 2025


Predicting the 2025 Pulitzer Prize Fiction winner with math!

I visited the five internet sites (the only ones I could find) which had predictions for the 2025 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction. Next I assigned points for the books' rankings on those sites. Ten points for the top contender down to one point for the 10th place on their list. (In the first column books 6-10 were tied so I gave them all 3 points.)

The thirteen titles, listed below on the chart, were the top contenders out of 26 books mentioned overall. Overall James by Percival Everett took top billing on all five sites, down to Tell Me Everything by Elizabeth Strout and The Hearing Test by Eliza Barry Callahan which were only mentioned by one predictor each, but were in the top half of their list, so I included them.



As you probably know, the Pulitzer Prize committee does not give readers any hints. On May 5th, they will just make an announcement of the winners (for fiction and for other categories) so this is really an effort in futility trying to predict the winner. Most (all?) other book prizes committees announce finalists or short lists  weeks/months in advance of the award ceremony. Every year the Pulitzer selection committee is different and the members are not even introduced until the day the awards go out. So one can't even guess based on past performance. But still, it is fun to take a guess and then wait to see the results.

Seven of the thirteen on my list were mentioned on the internet lists at last three times (out of five). Let me examine them a bit closer:

1. James by Percival Everett (50 pts.) 
Pro: 
a. A brilliant reimagining of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn story, told from the viewpoint of Jim, an enslaved man. It is an instant classic. 
b. So many literary merits --- among them...
    -National Book Award winner 2024
    -Andrew Carnegie Medal for Fiction 2025
    -Kirkus Prize for fiction 2024
    -Booker Prize Nominee shortlist 2024
    -PEN/Faulkner Award nominee shortlist 2025
Con: 
It is rare for the Pulitzer and the National Book Award to go to the same book.

2. Martyr! by Kaveh Akbar (31)
Pro:
a. "Electrifying, funny, wholly original." A fantastic debut novel by poet Akbar.
b. Literary merits --- among them:
    -National Book Award nominee shortlist 2024
    -Andrew Carnegie Medal nominee shortlist 2025
    -Brooklyn Public Library Prize for literary fiction 2024
Con:
Kaveh Akbar is a debut novelist so the committee wouldn't have previous nominations and writings to look back on. By comparison, Percival Everett was a finalist in 2021 for his novel Telephone. Often the award goes to writers who were finalists before. 

3. Wandering Stars by Tommy Orange (28)
Pro:
a. Orange's debut book, There There, garnered much literary merit. Wandering Stars is a sequel of equal merit, to my mind. It is truly an American story.
b. Literary merits:
    -Booker Prize Longlist nominee 2024
    -Joyce Carol Oats Prize nominee 2025
c. Covers important historical events of the Sand Creek Massacre of 1864 and the Carlisle Indian Industrial School autrocities.
Con: 
It is a sequel.

4. Beautyland by Marie-Helene Bertino (26)
Pro:
a. "It is a remarkable evocation of the feeling of being in exile at home, and it introduces a gentle, unforgettable alien for our times."
b. It is science fiction which would be a unique choice for the committee.
c. A National Book Critics Circle Nominee for 2024.
Con:
This book represents a miss for me, as I missed it when I was gathering the list of the top 50 books of 2024. Science fiction could also be considered a con, as one predictor said, "I don't think I've ever heard of the Nebula Award possibility in the same sentence as a potential Pulitzer."


5. My Friends by Hisham Matar (19)
Pro:
a. "A luminous novel about friendship, family, and the unthinkable realities of exile."
b. Literary merits:
    -Orwell Prize for Political fiction 2024
    -National Book Critics Circle Award 2024
    -Booker Prize longlist nominee 2024
    -National Book Award finalist 2024
Con: (?)
Though Hisham Matar was born in the US, he lives in Britain and is described as British-Libyan. He won the Pulitzer in 2017 in the Biography category.

6. All Fours by Miranda July (17)
Pro:
a. "A surprisingly funny novel about a woman who is upending her own life."
b. Literary merits:
    -Women's Prize nominee shortlist 2025
    -National Book Award finalist 2024
    -Carol Shield Prize nominee 2025
Con:
Touted as a woman's book, a lot of women won't be able to relate to having their lives upended. Greg at 'Supposedly Fun' describes this book as a cilantro book -- you either love it or hate it. // Only two predictors named this book.


7. The History of Sound by Ben Shattuck (16)
Pro:
a. Interconnected short stories set in New England
b. Literary merits:
    -Audie Award nominee 2025 for short stories
    -PEN/Faulkner Nominee fiction 2025
Con:
It has been a lot of years since a short story collection won the Pulitzer in fiction. This is another miss for me as it wasn't identified as one of the top 50 books of the year by my reckonings.



8. Creation Lake by Rachel Kushner (14)
Pro:
a. "A work of high art, high comedy, and unforgettable pleasure."
b. Literary merits:
    -PEN/Faulkner Nominee fiction 2025
    -National Book Award longlist 2024
    -Carol Shield Prize nominee 2025
    -Booker Prize shortlist 2024
Con:
It is a spy novel. Don't get me wrong, I like spy novels but does the committee?



The Pulitzer Prize winner for fiction will be announced on May 5th at noon.


And the winner is....






James
by Percival Everett. YAY!  Here is the announcement. The committee did the right thing and selected a book sure to become a classic!


-Anne

Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Review: THE OPTIMIST'S DAUGHTER


The Optimist's Daughter
by Eudora Welty is a short novel, divided into four parts, set in Mount Salus, Mississippi.
 
Part 1:
Judge McKelva goes with his young 2nd wife, Fay, and his adult daughter, Lauren, to see an ophthalmologist in New Orleans because of sudden onset of vision problems caused by a retinal tear. The judge insists that the doctor do the surgery himself instead of waiting for a specialist to arrive in a few days. The surgery is successful but the recovery is grueling. It requires weeks of lying still and flat with the eyes covered. The judge, a great reader, is distraught by his inability to do anything at all and slips into a despondent depression. Lauren understands his maliase and tries to perk him up by reading aloud to him from a Dickens novel. Fay, on the other hand, is upset because she is missing Mardi Gras and wants to celebrate her birthday. In her irritation she attempts to rouse her husband by pulling him from his hospital bed. She isn't successful but the damage is down. The judge dies, probably from a heart attack.

Part 2: 
The two women bring the body of the judge back to Mount Salus and are met by McKelva friends and family to help prepare for and to attend the funeral. Fay doesn't feel accepted by these people and is irritated by their presence. On the day of the funeral, however, her whole family, the Chisoms, arrives from Madrid, Texas. The difference in social class between the two families is very apparent and the ruckus this family causes provides the comedy in the midst of the tragedy. Lauren is mortified that her father ever associated with these people. Fay makes sure that the judge is laid to rest in the new part of the cemetery, not in the plot with his first wife, even though it overlooks the new freeway and there are plastic poinsettias on the graves.

Part 3: 
Fay returns to Texas with her family for a few days. Lauren is alone in her childhood home for the first time in her life. She overhears some of her mother's friends making fun of Fay and her family, and she surprises herself that she feels the need to step in a correct the record and to stop the chatter. Later Lauren finds some of her mother's papers, photos, mementos. She thinks back on her mother's illness which led to blindness and alienation, and eventually an early death. She also allowed herself to reflect on her own situation -- losing her husband Phil in WWII and ruminating about what his life could have/should have been like. 

Part 4:
That night Lauren wakes from a dream and realizes it was a memory of the train trip she took with Phil from Chicago to Mount Salus for their wedding. At one point they looked out the window at the river and could see the point at which the Ohio River joined the Mississippi River, becoming one. "All they could see was sky, water, birds, light, and confluence. It was the whole morning world. And they themselves were a part of the confluence" (159-160). Even though Phil was no longer with her, he could still tell her of her life which was a continuity of its love. This memory soothed her. Later Fay returns and the two women quarrel over a wrecked breadboard, a gift from Phil to her mother, and bicker over who killed the judge. Was it Lauren with her insistence that the judge lie still to the point of death or was it Fay who wanted him to quit his old man foolishness and get up. In the end Fay, with all her silly and inane ways, gets the house. And Lauren, by ending the fight and retaining her honor and her values, gets to keep her dignity and the promise that her memories still survive and can soothe her.

The Optimist's Daughter won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 1973. I wanted to read it for that reason alone. As I started the book I could actually feel my eyes rolling wondering why the committee picked a book with such a downer topic and a slow pace. Then, around part 3, I came to recognize the book held some universal truths about society, about class, and poverty and old money. I chided myself for being too quick to judge the book before I even finished it. In the end I found the book very touching and, this won't surprise any of my readers, I cried several tears.

My rating: 4 stars.
-Anne

Saturday, September 21, 2024

Review: THE KNOWN WORLD



Winner of the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, The Known World is "an ambitious, luminously written novel that ranges seamlessly between the past and future and back again to the present, it weaves together the lives of freed and enslaved blacks, whites, and Indians -- and allows all of us a deeper understanding of the enduring multidimensional world created by the institution of slavery" (Publisher).

The Known World tells the story of Henry Townsend, a black farmer and former slave in antebellum Virginia. His former owner, William Robbins, is the most powerful man in Manchester County and he brings Henry under his tutelage. By the time his parents, free Blacks, secured his freedom, Henry is determined to own slaves himself, against the wishes his father, Augustus. But why would a former slave want to enslave men? This uncomfortable question pervades the whole text. Why? Why, indeed!?

One answer is because slavery is legal, so why not? Another answer is Henry wants to prove that he can be a kind, generous owner, better than any White owners. But the truth of the matter is owning other people always brings out the worst in people. Henry might have thought of himself as kind and generous but that doesn't explain why he had the ear cut off one of his slaves who tried to escape. That certainly doesn't sound like kindness to me. By the time Henry dies he owns 33 slaves and none are especially sad that he is gone. His estate falls to Caledonia, Henry's wife. In her grief and ignorance about the running of the estate, chaos ensues, with several slaves escaping or disappearing, and the remaining souls turning on each other in anger and spite.

There are no heroes or true villains in The Known World because all the characters are poisoned by the rot caused by the institution of slavery, rotten to the core. No one escaped the stench.

Jones, a writing professor living in Washington DC, brought the story alive in a variety of ways. One was his use of language. The language of the book sounded authentic to the time period even to my 21 Century ears. Here is an example -- "It was said by many a slave that a servant’s feeling about a master could be discerned on any given day by whether the slave called him “Master,” “Marse,” or “Massa.” “Marse” could sound like a curse if the right woman said it in just the right way."

The Known World was identified as the fourth best book on the New York Times Best Books of the 21 Century, a list published this summer. It was the the best novel on the list written by an American author. When I saw the list I couldn't believe it. The Known World is the fourth best book of the century? How could that be? I hadn't even heard of it until I saw it on a list of past Pulitzer winners. Can a book really be lauded and overlooked at the same time? I guess so. Winner of the Pulitzer, the fourth best book of the century, and still few know about the book.  Well, I'm here to tell you that this book is worth the time it takes to read it. Yes, it is an uncomfortable topic, one that history has ignored, Blacks owning slaves, but one very worthy of our attention.

My rating: 4 stars.

-Anne

Recaps of four Pulitzer Prize fiction winners I read a long time ago



Several years ago I set myself the challenge of reading all the 21st Century Pulitzer Prize Fiction winners. This week I finished the last book on the list, the 2004 winner, The Known World by Jones. As I was writing a summary post of my challenge I realized I hadn't posted reviews for four of the books, all read before I became a book blogger. This morning I spent an hour or so looking through my book journals, where I kept a record of the books read. I would usually write a quick little reaction to each book, not really a review but more just a snapshot of how I felt about the book. For each book's recap, I will share the exact note written at the time of its reading, a short summary of the book from the publisher, and my recollection of the book from the perspective of time.

2002 Winner --- 

Empire Falls
by Richard Russo (Vintage Books, 2001)
Summary: 
Welcome to Empire Falls, a blue-collar town full of abandoned mills whose citizens surround themselves with the comforts and feuds provided by lifelong friends and neighbors and who find humor and hope in the most unlikely places, in this Pulitzer Prize-winning novel by Richard Russo.

Miles Roby has been slinging burgers at the Empire Grill for 20 years, a job that cost him his college education and much of his self-respect. What keeps him there? It could be his bright, sensitive daughter Tick, who needs all his help surviving the local high school. Or maybe it’s Janine, Miles’ soon-to-be ex-wife, who’s taken up with a noxiously vain health-club proprietor. Or perhaps it’s the imperious Francine Whiting, who owns everything in town–and seems to believe that “everything” includes Miles himself. In Empire Falls
 Richard Russo delves deep into the blue-collar heart of America in a work that overflows with hilarity, heartache, and grace. (Publisher)
Snapshot of my reaction to book in August 2003:
"I had this book recommended to me so many times by so many people I thought I'd better read it. I liked it and found the character development good." 

Recollection with the perspective of time:
First, I want to cover my eyes over my short snapshot. How unhelpful were those thoughts?  I actually have very little memory of the book. I remember liking the main character, Miles Roby, and that the book was set in a down-and-out community. I realize that is not very helpful either. As a high school librarian I would often converse with teachers about their favorite books and Empire Falls was the absolute favorite of a Social Studies teacher. In fact, he liked it so much, no other book could get anywhere near it so he was living in a constant state of disappointment about other books thanks to this one. I'm thinking this book deserves a reread.

2003 Winner --

Middlesex
by Jeffrey Eugenides (Picador, 2002)
Summary: 
Middlesex tells the breathtaking story of Calliope Stephanides, and three generations of the Greek-American Stephanides family, who travel from a tiny village overlooking Mount Olympus in Asia Minor to Prohibition-era Detroit, witnessing its glory days as the Motor City and the race riots of 1967 before moving out to the tree-lined streets of suburban Grosse Pointe, Michigan. To understand why Calliope is not like other girls, she has to uncover a guilty family secret, and the astonishing genetic history that turns Callie into Cal, one of the most audacious and wondrous narrators in contemporary fiction. Lyrical and thrilling, Middlesex is an exhilarating reinvention of the American epic. (Publisher)
Snapshot from February 2007: 
"I listened to this book club selection in audiobook format and thoroughly enjoyed it. I realized that a great deal of my pleasure in the book was derived by the audio format as other gals in my club, who all read it, found it tedious or difficult. The protagonist, Cal or Calli, was a hermaphrodite, which is an unusual topic. I did love the the prose and also the many references to the pop culture of the 1970s."

Recollection:
Clearly I wrote my snapshot reactions for myself, never thinking I'd share the drivel with others. Middlesex has aged very well in my memory. What is shocking about my reaction is how I missed so many of the parts of the multifaceted plot: In addition to Cal's transgender trauma/dilemma, there was a fairly detailed account of the Armenian genocide, and likewise the details about Detroit as the Motor City and its 1967 Race Riot. It was the first time I'd read anything about those events. In my ranking of Pulitzers, I ranked Middlesex as "Very Good." I bet if I reread it, it might get an upgrade to "Great."

2006 winner --

March
by Geraldine Brooks (Penguin, 2005)
Summary:
From the author of the acclaimed Year of Wonders, a historical novel and love story set during a time of catastrophe, on the front lines of the American Civil War. Acclaimed author Geraldine Brooks gives us the story of the absent father from Louisa May Alcott's Little Women—and conjures a world of brutality, stubborn courage and transcendent love. An idealistic abolitionist, March has gone as chaplain to serve the Union cause. But the war tests his faith not only in the Union—which is also capable of barbarism and racism—but in himself. As he recovers from a near-fatal illness, March must reassemble and reconnect with his family, who have no idea of what he has endured. A love story set in a time of catastrophe, March explores the passions between a man and a woman, the tenderness of parent and child, and the life-changing power of an ardently held belief. (Publisher)
Snapshot from February 2008:
"This is Little Women from Mr. March's point of view. It covers the time preceding and during the Civil War. The book was well-written and a good match with Alcott's style. the historical information was especially thought-provoking but I didn't think Brooks developed her characters fully. Many members in my book club liked the book more than I did. One interesting note, Brooks utilized the journals of Bronson Alcott [Louisa May Alcott's father] for information for this book which brought real authenticity to references to the time period and realistic descriptions of the horrors of war."

Recollections: I am a huge Geraldine Brooks fan. I've read five of her books and want to read two others. Oddly I can remember just about all the details of the other four books and just about none from this one. Unlike the other books in this batch, I have no desire to reread March.

2009 winner --

Olive Kitteridge
by Elizabeth Strout (Random House, 2008)

Summary:
At times stern, at other times patient, at times perceptive, at other times in sad denial, Olive Kitteridge, a retired schoolteacher, deplores the changes in her little town of Crosby, Maine, and in the world at large, but she doesn’t always recognize the changes in those around her: a lounge musician haunted by a past romance; a former student who has lost the will to live; Olive’s own adult child, who feels tyrannized by her irrational sensitivities; and her husband, Henry, who finds his loyalty to his marriage both a blessing and a curse.

As the townspeople grapple with their problems, mild and dire, Olive is brought to a deeper understanding of herself and her life—sometimes painfully, but always with ruthless honesty. Olive Kitteridge offers profound insights into the human condition—its conflicts, its tragedies and joys, and the endurance it requires. (Publisher)

Snapshot from August 2010:
"Thirteen vignettes all involving Olive Kitteridge as either a major or a secondary character. Olive is a cranky, unlovable, retired JH Math teacher. She lives in Crosby, Maine. She seems to delight in the pain of others yet is occasionally capable of remarkable acts of love and compassion. I really enjoyed this book and the contemplation of such a multifaceted person."

Recollections: Olive Kitteridge, the character, has made an appearance in several of Strout's other books, including the sequel to this book, Olive, Again. Back in 2010 when we read this book for book club, I recall a large part of our discussion centering around the question, Can you like a book when the main character is so unlovable? I really enjoy all of the Strout books I've read and I enjoy remeeting characters in them. I don't think I need to reread Olive Kitteridge but I do want to read Strout's new book, Tell Me Everything, where I understand, I will once again meet Olive.

This was a fun activity. Maybe I should do it for other books I read before my book blogging days. I hope you enjoyed these short recaps, too.

-Anne

Friday, June 28, 2024

Review: NIGHT WATCH -- Where I try to figure out why this book won the Pulitzer? (+Book Club Discussion Questions)

To the shock of just about the whole world, Night Watch by Jayne Anne Phillips won the 2024 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction this year. No one was talking about this book. It wasn't on anyone's end-of-year best books of 2023 lists. (Fact check:  this compilation.) Awarding this high literary honor to Night Watch and the other two finalists felt like a minor league team won the world series without anyone knowing they were even in the playoffs.

So why did Night Watch win the Pulitzer? Let's see if I can figure anything out.

Night Watch is set in West Virginia before, during, and after the Civil War. Instead of focusing on slavery or on the death tolls of the battles, this book examines the horrors citizens had to endure in the aftermath of the conflict. It also shines a light on one example of enlightened treatment of the mentally ill during this time period.

ConaLee, the twelve-year-old daughter of a man who went off to war and never returned, opens the book with her first person narration. The point of view switches throughout the book as other characters come in and out of focus, but ConaLee is the only one who tells her own story. She was born after her father left for war and her mother, Eliza, is raising her alone in the mountains of Appalachia, with the help of a neighbor, Dearbhla, an Irish healer who acts like her grandmother.  At some point a terrifying man arrives and tells ConaLee to call him 'Papa'. She thinks this man is her father. He is not, but he stays on and tyrannizes Eliza to the point where she has a complete mental and physical breakdown. There is a horrifying rape scene which is so graphic I cringe to think of it. Finally this terrible man dumps both ConLee and her mother at the Trans-Allegheny Lunatic Asylum. This ends up being a good thing because the director is following the moral practices of  Dr. Thomas Story Kirkbride, an actual historical person. Under the care of the director of this facility, Eliza starts to recover and ConaLee, who is posing as her nurse, find solace from their tortured life outside. While inside they meet a cast of characters among them is the Night Watch, a man with a history of his own.

Kirkus Reviews describes the book as having "haunting storytelling and a refreshing look at history." The Guardian sums up its review with "Night Watch is tough, even excruciating at times, but small notes of grace make an appearance throughout the novel." While Dwight Garner, writing a review of the book for the New York Times said, "Jayne Anne Phillips’s new novel...is sludgy, claustrophobic and pretentious. Each succeeding paragraph took something out of me." And Greg, a vlogger at Supposedly Fun, had this to say, "I hated, hated, hated this book." He explains several of his issues deal with the confusing way Phillips tells the story, dribbling out details, moving backwards and forward in time, including unnecessary characters and information that does not move the story forward. He thinks the Pulitzer Committee made a mistake in selecting Night Watch.

Wow. Some good and some extremely eviscerating comments from reviewers who know a whole lot more than me about what makes a book a good one. I was especially shocked by the NYT times reviewer calling the book sludgy and claustrophobic. Is such a negative review even allowed? 

So why did the Pulitzer Committee select Night Watch over standouts like North Woods, Tom Lake, Absolution, and The Heaven and Earth Grocery Store? Greg, from Supposedly Fun, criticizes the clandestine process the Pulitzer uses to select their winners. No one even knows who the judges are until after the process. No short list of books are announced ahead of time. Each year's panel of judges can use, and do use, whatever set of selection guidelines they choose. These guidelines, therefore, change every year. 2023 Pulitzer prize went to the two top books of the year so Greg wondered it this year's committee decided to do the opposite and give the award to a more obscure book. In fact, Michael Chabon, one of the jurors this year, wrote, "Beyond the winner and 2 runners-up, I want to shine a light on three excellent books, among the many nominees I deeply dug, by less well-known, less heralded writers." This tells me that at least Michael Chabon was focused on bringing forward less well-known works to light in his role as a Pulitzer judge. How maddening is that? Ann Patchett, James McBride, Alice McDermott were all at the top of their game and they and their books get shoved aside because Night Watch was less well-known. That seems like a ludicrous reason to select a book for this award.

In January I created a tiered ranking list of all the Pulitzer novels I've read. I created the categories myself, from BEST to DIDN'T LIKE and several levels between. Right now, if I were to place Night Watch onto my tiered ranking list, it would be on the bottom level, 'Didn't Like', with Tinkers, A Visit From the Goon Squad, and Breathing Lessons. I wouldn't go as far as Greg, who hated the book, or Dwight who thought the book sucked the life out of him. But I doubt I will tell anyone to read the book and might even go into details why I hope they don't. I'll start with a warning about the rape scene. Ugh. Shivers. 😖

The publisher has not prepared any discussion questions that I could find, so a friend and I came up with our own questions before our meeting. Here they are. Help yourself:

Night Watch Discussion Questions:

  1. What did you think of Night Watch by Jane Anne Phillips?
  2. Kirkus Reviews describes the book as having "haunting storytelling and a refreshing look at history." What do you think were its moments of “refreshing storytelling?"
  3. The Guardian sums up its review with "Night Watch is tough, even excruciating at times, but small notes of grace make an appearance throughout the novel." List a few of the grace notes in Night Watch.
  4. Dwight Garner, writing a review of the book for the New York Times said, "Jayne Anne Phillips’s new novel...is sludgy, claustrophobic and pretentious. Each succeeding paragraph took something out of me." Describe Night Watch in one or two sentences.
  5. How did this book add to your knowledge of the Civil War and its effects on soldiers and families?
  6. How did the lack of quotation marks add to or detract from the story?
  7. Which characters did you find the most compelling and why?
  8. The Trans-Allegheny lunatic Asylum was a real place and used moral treatment. What did you think of the strategies used to treat the patients?
  9. When did you suspect that the night watch was ConaLee's father? Did Eliza know earlier on? 
  10. Did you find the ending realistic or contrived? Why? 
  11. What importance and structure did Dearbhla provide to the story? 
  12. How necessary was it to portray graphic rape or war violence in a book about the Civil War? Is the brutality necessary to our understanding of the conditions of this time? 
  13. Night Watch won the Pulitzer Prize. Do you think it deserved it? What does its winning do to your regard for the selection process?
  14. Where would you rank Night Watch among the other Pulitzer Prize novels you’ve read? [These are the Pulitzer Prize winners we've read: March; Sympathizer; Goldfinch; Nickel Boys; Less; Night Watchman; Demon Copperhead; Night Watch.]

2024 Twenty Books of Summer Challenge

8 / 20 books. 40% done!



 

 


Thursday, May 2, 2019

Review: The Great Believers


I started teaching in the fall of 1980. I was a junior high teacher at the time teaching health and PE. As a college student majoring in health education I learned everything there was to know at the time about what we then called STDs or sexually transmitted diseases and I was prepared to impart my knowledge onto my students in hopes that they wouldn't get one of them. In those days scientists didn't know that HPV (genital warts) were related to genital cancers and the worst STD that I knew about was syphilis, though there was a cure if treated early enough. I remember the moment in 1983 or '84 when a parent questioned me about what I was teaching about AIDS. At the time I had no inkling of how serious and life-threatening the disease was and how it would dominate my curriculum for years to come. In 1988 or '89 our state required mandatory AIDS prevention lessons for every student from grades 5-12, every year. In my schools those required lessons often fell to me, though not always. Not only would students' eyes glass over during those lessons but so would the teachers'. An important topic became boring and tedious. I did a lot of personal education on the topic of HIV and AIDS, attending conferences, visiting AIDS hospice houses, interviewing people who were HIV+ about the drugs they had to take and the symptoms they were hoping to thwart. I remember throwing around terms like cytomegalovirus, histoplasmosis, thrush, toxoplasmosis, Kaposi sarcoma, and HIV-wasting syndrome. I knew more about HIV/AIDS on the educational level than the average person, but not much on the personal level.

As I started reading The Great Believers by Rebecca Makkai this past week I was hit head-on with how very little I really understood about the AIDS crisis on a personal level. The book chronicles the AIDS epidemic from its inception in 1983 to the current time. Surprisingly this hasn't been done in literature up to this point.

When the AIDS epidemic begins to race its way through the gay community in Chicago's Boystown neighborhood in 1983, Yale Tishman and Fiona Marcus become good friends. Fiona's brother, Nico, was the first of the artsy friend group of gay men to die of AIDS. Since Nico was disowned by his parents, Fiona became his caretaker at the end of his life. Yale, who is employed at an art museum, was in the same group as Nico so he got to know Fiona. In fact, it was because of a recommendation from Fiona that Yale got a lead on securing a career-changing art collection from her great-aunt Nora, who was a model for some famous artists in Paris in 1910s and 1920s. At age 90, Aunt Nora wanted the whole collection to stay together because among the pieces were ones painted by her lover, Ranko Novak, who was not well-known because of injuries sustained during the Great War. She sees it as her mission to save his memory once she is gone.

As exciting as the art collection is to Yale, his private life is taking a decidedly negative turn as his friends and his partner, Charlie, are testing positive for HIV infection. Everyone is talking about "safe sex" but is anyone actually practicing it? As his relationship crumbles it also looks like the art collection may not come to the museum, at least if Nora's family has any say. Everything is a mess.

Fast forward thirty years in Paris in 2015 and we see Fiona looking for her wayward daughter, Clara, and her possible grandchild. Fiona's relationship with her daughter was always strained. She became so depressed as she became the care-taker for her brother's friends as they died one by one, she really couldn't be a good mother. Her daughter always pushed her away and eventually ran away. Fiona had been looking for Clara for three years before ending up in Paris at the home of a famous photographer friend, Richard, who was also in Chicago in the 1980s. He is a preparing for an art show of his photographs, some of them of her gay friends now long dead.

Makkai does a masterful job of tying together several story threads. One is the obvious story of the AIDS epidemic and all the lives that were lost to it under horrific circumstances. Another thread is the art collection and life in Paris at the beginning of the twentieth century. Nora was considered to be a member of the "Lost Generation". This generation of people came of age during WWI where 40 million people died. The term "lost" also refers to their aimlessness and disorientation after the war. Nora's experiences were very similar to those that Yale and Fiona experienced in the 1980s, the death of so many, many fine young people. The last thread is Fiona's story. Fiona stand for all those women who ended up being the caretakers for AIDS patients. Nora first and Fiona later become aware of their role in preserving memories which were never documented.

I was blown away by The Great Believers. The title comes from a quote in My Generation by F. Scott Fitzgerald, We were the great believers, I have never cared for any men as much as for those who felt the first springs of life when I did, and saw death ahead, and were reprieved — and who now walk the long stormy summer.  I saw for the first time a new take on a topic which had dominated my life for the majority of my teaching life---a very personal take. I realize now that with each death there were friends, relatives, and caretakers who were asked to shoulder the lion's share of the burden. We also have been robbed of all of their memories.

I listened to the audiobook read by Michael Crouch. By the last hour of my seventeen hours of listening I was crying and sobbing. This is a problem since I was driving. I would have to remove my glasses to wipe my eyes over and over. Later that night, as I was recapping the book for my husband I started crying again. Every moment of it touched me on the deepest level. Though The Great Believers didn't win any of the big literary prizes of 2018, but it came close. It was a finalist for the National Book Award and a Pulitzer Prize finalist. It was a New York Times Top Ten Books of 2018. It is a not-to-be missed book. But I warn you, have your hankie ready. Now I've got to figure out how to get my book club to read this book. I am desperate to discuss it with someone else who has read it.


RHS Book Club August 2019