Cutting through the rot and horror, like a system of trenches. is a savage satire of war, reminiscent of Catch-22 and Dr. Strangelove. Kraus’s most indelible creation in this vein is the sneering Major General Reis, so desperate for a Medal of Honor that he’d single-handedly prolong the war until he gets one (Winters).
Friday, July 17, 2026
Review: ANGEL DOWN (2026 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction winner)
Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Classic review: THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS
The Magnificent Ambersons by Booth Tarkington won the Pulitzer Prize for the best novel in 1919. At the time Tarkington was considered one of America's best novelists and was often compared to Mark Twain. Tarkington was from Indiana and The Magnificent Ambersons story could have been taken from his own family's fall from fame. Though he was very popular when he was alive, publishing over 45 books and 25 plays, he did not remain popular after his death. By the middle of the twentieth century "he was ignored in academia: no congresses, no societies, no journals of 'Tarkington Studies'." In 1985 he was used as the example of the disparity of a writer's fame while alive compared to their oblivion after death. Fortunately for Mark Twain, no one is comparing the two authors today.
Magnificence, like the size of a fortune, is always comparative, as even Magnificent Lorenzo may now perceive, if he has happened to haunt New York in 1916; and the Ambersons were magnificent in their day and place. Their splendour lasted throughout all the years that saw their Midland town spread and darken into a city, but reached its topmost during the period when every prosperous family with children kept a Newfoundland dog. In that town, in those days, all the women who wore silk or velvet knew all the other women who wore silk or velvet, and when there was a new purchase of sealskin, sick people were got to windows to see it go by. Trotters were out, in the winter afternoons, racing light sleighs on National Avenue and Tennessee Street; everybody recognized both the trotters and the drivers; and again knew them as well on summer evenings, when slim buggies whizzed by in renewals of the snow-time rivalry. For that matter, everybody knew everybody else's family horse-and-carriage, could identify such a silhouette half a mile down the street, and thereby was sure who was going to market, or to a reception, or coming home from office or store to noon dinner or evening supper.
Wednesday, May 7, 2025
A Little Bit of Pulitzer Drama: JAMES
- Headshot: 3.5 stars; 10,108 ratings; 1,890 reviews
- Unicorn Woman: 3.09 stars; 140 ratings. 27 reviews.
- Mice 1961: 3.52 stars; 61 ratings; 19 reviews.
- James: 4.49 stars; 294,414 ratings; 32,758 reviews.
-First, a reminder of the process -- a jury of five authors and literary critics wade through a vast number of books each year and select three titles to forward to the Pulitzer Board. The board then takes a vote which of the three to select as the winner. If the board cannot reach a majority decision on one book they may decide to not give out an award, as they did in 2012, or they can reach back to the jury and ask for another recommendation. James was the 4th book on their list.-As delighted as many in the literary world were with James, it was mentioned that the three finalists were all authored by women. And James, the only book of the four authored by a man, was selected. Many wanted to pick at that scab, but Stacey Levine, author of Mice 1961, was demissive to this criticism, noting in an email that, at a moment when diversity initiatives and public funding for the arts are at risk, the Pulitzer Prize stands for integrity — a quality worth celebrating.“Percival’s book is so important in this regard,” Levine wrote in an email. “Is this really the time to fuss about what might or might not be gender politics in a literary contest?”
Friday, May 2, 2025
Predicting the Pulitzer Prize Fiction for 2025
As you probably know, the Pulitzer Prize committee does not give readers any hints. On May 5th, they will just make an announcement of the winners (for fiction and for other categories) so this is really an effort in futility trying to predict the winner. Most (all?) other book prizes committees announce finalists or short lists weeks/months in advance of the award ceremony. Every year the Pulitzer selection committee is different and the members are not even introduced until the day the awards go out. So one can't even guess based on past performance. But still, it is fun to take a guess and then wait to see the results.
James by Percival Everett. YAY! Here is the announcement. The committee did the right thing and selected a book sure to become a classic!
Wednesday, January 22, 2025
Review: THE OPTIMIST'S DAUGHTER
The Optimist's Daughter by Eudora Welty is a short novel, divided into four parts, set in Mount Salus, Mississippi.
Saturday, September 21, 2024
Review: THE KNOWN WORLD
The Known World was identified as the fourth best book on the New York Times Best Books of the 21 Century, a list published this summer. It was the the best novel on the list written by an American author. When I saw the list I couldn't believe it. The Known World is the fourth best book of the century? How could that be? I hadn't even heard of it until I saw it on a list of past Pulitzer winners. Can a book really be lauded and overlooked at the same time? I guess so. Winner of the Pulitzer, the fourth best book of the century, and still few know about the book. Well, I'm here to tell you that this book is worth the time it takes to read it. Yes, it is an uncomfortable topic, one that history has ignored, Blacks owning slaves, but one very worthy of our attention.
Recaps of four Pulitzer Prize fiction winners I read a long time ago
Welcome to Empire Falls, a blue-collar town full of abandoned mills whose citizens surround themselves with the comforts and feuds provided by lifelong friends and neighbors and who find humor and hope in the most unlikely places, in this Pulitzer Prize-winning novel by Richard Russo.
Miles Roby has been slinging burgers at the Empire Grill for 20 years, a job that cost him his college education and much of his self-respect. What keeps him there? It could be his bright, sensitive daughter Tick, who needs all his help surviving the local high school. Or maybe it’s Janine, Miles’ soon-to-be ex-wife, who’s taken up with a noxiously vain health-club proprietor. Or perhaps it’s the imperious Francine Whiting, who owns everything in town–and seems to believe that “everything” includes Miles himself. In Empire Falls Richard Russo delves deep into the blue-collar heart of America in a work that overflows with hilarity, heartache, and grace. (Publisher)
Middlesex tells the breathtaking story of Calliope Stephanides, and three generations of the Greek-American Stephanides family, who travel from a tiny village overlooking Mount Olympus in Asia Minor to Prohibition-era Detroit, witnessing its glory days as the Motor City and the race riots of 1967 before moving out to the tree-lined streets of suburban Grosse Pointe, Michigan. To understand why Calliope is not like other girls, she has to uncover a guilty family secret, and the astonishing genetic history that turns Callie into Cal, one of the most audacious and wondrous narrators in contemporary fiction. Lyrical and thrilling, Middlesex is an exhilarating reinvention of the American epic. (Publisher)
From the author of the acclaimed Year of Wonders, a historical novel and love story set during a time of catastrophe, on the front lines of the American Civil War. Acclaimed author Geraldine Brooks gives us the story of the absent father from Louisa May Alcott's Little Women—and conjures a world of brutality, stubborn courage and transcendent love. An idealistic abolitionist, March has gone as chaplain to serve the Union cause. But the war tests his faith not only in the Union—which is also capable of barbarism and racism—but in himself. As he recovers from a near-fatal illness, March must reassemble and reconnect with his family, who have no idea of what he has endured. A love story set in a time of catastrophe, March explores the passions between a man and a woman, the tenderness of parent and child, and the life-changing power of an ardently held belief. (Publisher)
Recollections: I am a huge Geraldine Brooks fan. I've read five of her books and want to read two others. Oddly I can remember just about all the details of the other four books and just about none from this one. Unlike the other books in this batch, I have no desire to reread March.
At times stern, at other times patient, at times perceptive, at other times in sad denial, Olive Kitteridge, a retired schoolteacher, deplores the changes in her little town of Crosby, Maine, and in the world at large, but she doesn’t always recognize the changes in those around her: a lounge musician haunted by a past romance; a former student who has lost the will to live; Olive’s own adult child, who feels tyrannized by her irrational sensitivities; and her husband, Henry, who finds his loyalty to his marriage both a blessing and a curse.
As the townspeople grapple with their problems, mild and dire, Olive is brought to a deeper understanding of herself and her life—sometimes painfully, but always with ruthless honesty. Olive Kitteridge offers profound insights into the human condition—its conflicts, its tragedies and joys, and the endurance it requires. (Publisher)
Friday, June 28, 2024
Review: NIGHT WATCH -- Where I try to figure out why this book won the Pulitzer? (+Book Club Discussion Questions)
So why did Night Watch win the Pulitzer? Let's see if I can figure anything out.
Night Watch is set in West Virginia before, during, and after the Civil War. Instead of focusing on slavery or on the death tolls of the battles, this book examines the horrors citizens had to endure in the aftermath of the conflict. It also shines a light on one example of enlightened treatment of the mentally ill during this time period.
ConaLee, the twelve-year-old daughter of a man who went off to war and never returned, opens the book with her first person narration. The point of view switches throughout the book as other characters come in and out of focus, but ConaLee is the only one who tells her own story. She was born after her father left for war and her mother, Eliza, is raising her alone in the mountains of Appalachia, with the help of a neighbor, Dearbhla, an Irish healer who acts like her grandmother. At some point a terrifying man arrives and tells ConaLee to call him 'Papa'. She thinks this man is her father. He is not, but he stays on and tyrannizes Eliza to the point where she has a complete mental and physical breakdown. There is a horrifying rape scene which is so graphic I cringe to think of it. Finally this terrible man dumps both ConLee and her mother at the Trans-Allegheny Lunatic Asylum. This ends up being a good thing because the director is following the moral practices of Dr. Thomas Story Kirkbride, an actual historical person. Under the care of the director of this facility, Eliza starts to recover and ConaLee, who is posing as her nurse, find solace from their tortured life outside. While inside they meet a cast of characters among them is the Night Watch, a man with a history of his own.
Kirkus Reviews describes the book as having "haunting storytelling and a refreshing look at history." The Guardian sums up its review with "Night Watch is tough, even excruciating at times, but small notes of grace make an appearance throughout the novel." While Dwight Garner, writing a review of the book for the New York Times said, "Jayne Anne Phillips’s new novel...is sludgy, claustrophobic and pretentious. Each succeeding paragraph took something out of me." And Greg, a vlogger at Supposedly Fun, had this to say, "I hated, hated, hated this book." He explains several of his issues deal with the confusing way Phillips tells the story, dribbling out details, moving backwards and forward in time, including unnecessary characters and information that does not move the story forward. He thinks the Pulitzer Committee made a mistake in selecting Night Watch.
Wow. Some good and some extremely eviscerating comments from reviewers who know a whole lot more than me about what makes a book a good one. I was especially shocked by the NYT times reviewer calling the book sludgy and claustrophobic. Is such a negative review even allowed?
So why did the Pulitzer Committee select Night Watch over standouts like North Woods, Tom Lake, Absolution, and The Heaven and Earth Grocery Store? Greg, from Supposedly Fun, criticizes the clandestine process the Pulitzer uses to select their winners. No one even knows who the judges are until after the process. No short list of books are announced ahead of time. Each year's panel of judges can use, and do use, whatever set of selection guidelines they choose. These guidelines, therefore, change every year. 2023 Pulitzer prize went to the two top books of the year so Greg wondered it this year's committee decided to do the opposite and give the award to a more obscure book. In fact, Michael Chabon, one of the jurors this year, wrote, "Beyond the winner and 2 runners-up, I want to shine a light on three excellent books, among the many nominees I deeply dug, by less well-known, less heralded writers." This tells me that at least Michael Chabon was focused on bringing forward less well-known works to light in his role as a Pulitzer judge. How maddening is that? Ann Patchett, James McBride, Alice McDermott were all at the top of their game and they and their books get shoved aside because Night Watch was less well-known. That seems like a ludicrous reason to select a book for this award.
In January I created a tiered ranking list of all the Pulitzer novels I've read. I created the categories myself, from BEST to DIDN'T LIKE and several levels between. Right now, if I were to place Night Watch onto my tiered ranking list, it would be on the bottom level, 'Didn't Like', with Tinkers, A Visit From the Goon Squad, and Breathing Lessons. I wouldn't go as far as Greg, who hated the book, or Dwight who thought the book sucked the life out of him. But I doubt I will tell anyone to read the book and might even go into details why I hope they don't. I'll start with a warning about the rape scene. Ugh. Shivers. 😖
The publisher has not prepared any discussion questions that I could find, so a friend and I came up with our own questions before our meeting. Here they are. Help yourself:
Night Watch Discussion Questions:
- What did you think of Night Watch by Jane Anne Phillips?
- Kirkus Reviews describes the book as having "haunting storytelling and a refreshing look at history." What do you think were its moments of “refreshing storytelling?"
- The Guardian sums up its review with "Night Watch is tough, even excruciating at times, but small notes of grace make an appearance throughout the novel." List a few of the grace notes in Night Watch.
- Dwight Garner, writing a review of the book for the New York Times said, "Jayne Anne Phillips’s new novel...is sludgy, claustrophobic and pretentious. Each succeeding paragraph took something out of me." Describe Night Watch in one or two sentences.
- How did this book add to your knowledge of the Civil War and its effects on soldiers and families?
- How did the lack of quotation marks add to or detract from the story?
- Which characters did you find the most compelling and why?
- The Trans-Allegheny lunatic Asylum was a real place and used moral treatment. What did you think of the strategies used to treat the patients?
- When did you suspect that the night watch was ConaLee's father? Did Eliza know earlier on?
- Did
you find the ending realistic or contrived? Why?
- What
importance and structure did Dearbhla provide to the story?
- How
necessary was it to portray graphic rape or war violence in a book about
the Civil War? Is the brutality necessary to our understanding of the
conditions of this time?
- Night Watch won the Pulitzer Prize. Do you think it deserved it? What does its winning do to your regard for the selection process?
- Where would you rank Night Watch among the other Pulitzer Prize novels you’ve read? [These are the Pulitzer Prize winners we've read: March; Sympathizer; Goldfinch; Nickel Boys; Less; Night Watchman; Demon Copperhead; Night Watch.]
Thursday, May 2, 2019
Review: The Great Believers
I started teaching in the fall of 1980. I was a junior high teacher at the time teaching health and PE. As a college student majoring in health education I learned everything there was to know at the time about what we then called STDs or sexually transmitted diseases and I was prepared to impart my knowledge onto my students in hopes that they wouldn't get one of them. In those days scientists didn't know that HPV (genital warts) were related to genital cancers and the worst STD that I knew about was syphilis, though there was a cure if treated early enough. I remember the moment in 1983 or '84 when a parent questioned me about what I was teaching about AIDS. At the time I had no inkling of how serious and life-threatening the disease was and how it would dominate my curriculum for years to come. In 1988 or '89 our state required mandatory AIDS prevention lessons for every student from grades 5-12, every year. In my schools those required lessons often fell to me, though not always. Not only would students' eyes glass over during those lessons but so would the teachers'. An important topic became boring and tedious. I did a lot of personal education on the topic of HIV and AIDS, attending conferences, visiting AIDS hospice houses, interviewing people who were HIV+ about the drugs they had to take and the symptoms they were hoping to thwart. I remember throwing around terms like cytomegalovirus, histoplasmosis, thrush, toxoplasmosis, Kaposi sarcoma, and HIV-wasting syndrome. I knew more about HIV/AIDS on the educational level than the average person, but not much on the personal level.
As I started reading The Great Believers by Rebecca Makkai this past week I was hit head-on with how very little I really understood about the AIDS crisis on a personal level. The book chronicles the AIDS epidemic from its inception in 1983 to the current time. Surprisingly this hasn't been done in literature up to this point.
When the AIDS epidemic begins to race its way through the gay community in Chicago's Boystown neighborhood in 1983, Yale Tishman and Fiona Marcus become good friends. Fiona's brother, Nico, was the first of the artsy friend group of gay men to die of AIDS. Since Nico was disowned by his parents, Fiona became his caretaker at the end of his life. Yale, who is employed at an art museum, was in the same group as Nico so he got to know Fiona. In fact, it was because of a recommendation from Fiona that Yale got a lead on securing a career-changing art collection from her great-aunt Nora, who was a model for some famous artists in Paris in 1910s and 1920s. At age 90, Aunt Nora wanted the whole collection to stay together because among the pieces were ones painted by her lover, Ranko Novak, who was not well-known because of injuries sustained during the Great War. She sees it as her mission to save his memory once she is gone.
As exciting as the art collection is to Yale, his private life is taking a decidedly negative turn as his friends and his partner, Charlie, are testing positive for HIV infection. Everyone is talking about "safe sex" but is anyone actually practicing it? As his relationship crumbles it also looks like the art collection may not come to the museum, at least if Nora's family has any say. Everything is a mess.
Fast forward thirty years in Paris in 2015 and we see Fiona looking for her wayward daughter, Clara, and her possible grandchild. Fiona's relationship with her daughter was always strained. She became so depressed as she became the care-taker for her brother's friends as they died one by one, she really couldn't be a good mother. Her daughter always pushed her away and eventually ran away. Fiona had been looking for Clara for three years before ending up in Paris at the home of a famous photographer friend, Richard, who was also in Chicago in the 1980s. He is a preparing for an art show of his photographs, some of them of her gay friends now long dead.
Makkai does a masterful job of tying together several story threads. One is the obvious story of the AIDS epidemic and all the lives that were lost to it under horrific circumstances. Another thread is the art collection and life in Paris at the beginning of the twentieth century. Nora was considered to be a member of the "Lost Generation". This generation of people came of age during WWI where 40 million people died. The term "lost" also refers to their aimlessness and disorientation after the war. Nora's experiences were very similar to those that Yale and Fiona experienced in the 1980s, the death of so many, many fine young people. The last thread is Fiona's story. Fiona stand for all those women who ended up being the caretakers for AIDS patients. Nora first and Fiona later become aware of their role in preserving memories which were never documented.
I was blown away by The Great Believers. The title comes from a quote in My Generation by F. Scott Fitzgerald, “We were the great believers, I have never cared for any men as much as for those who felt the first springs of life when I did, and saw death ahead, and were reprieved — and who now walk the long stormy summer.” I saw for the first time a new take on a topic which had dominated my life for the majority of my teaching life---a very personal take. I realize now that with each death there were friends, relatives, and caretakers who were asked to shoulder the lion's share of the burden. We also have been robbed of all of their memories.
I listened to the audiobook read by Michael Crouch. By the last hour of my seventeen hours of listening I was crying and sobbing. This is a problem since I was driving. I would have to remove my glasses to wipe my eyes over and over. Later that night, as I was recapping the book for my husband I started crying again. Every moment of it touched me on the deepest level. Though The Great Believers didn't win any of the big literary prizes of 2018, but it came close. It was a finalist for the National Book Award and a Pulitzer Prize finalist. It was a New York Times Top Ten Books of 2018. It is a not-to-be missed book. But I warn you, have your hankie ready. Now I've got to figure out how to get my book club to read this book. I am desperate to discuss it with someone else who has read it.
RHS Book Club August 2019
























